Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Ties among spouse character attribute resemblance, matchmaking start, matchmaking high quality, and you can love. [ Website links ]
Baxter, L. A good., & Western, L. (2003). Partners perceptions of its parallels and distinctions: Good dialectical position. Diary off Private and you can Social Dating, 20, 491-514. [ Links ]
Berscheid, E. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you will emotion. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can incompatible dating (pp. 143-161). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, Elizabeth., & Walster, G. W. (1971). Physical appeal and relationships alternatives: A test of the coordinating hypothesis. Log regarding Experimental Societal Psychology, eight, 173-189. [ Hyperlinks ]
Diary out of Public and private Relationships, 24, 479-496
Berscheid, E., & Regan, P. (2005). This new therapy out of social matchmaking. Higher Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education (Prentice Hall). [ Hyperlinks ]
Berger, C. Roentgen. (1975). Activity performance and you may attributional communication as determinants regarding social interest. Message Monographs, forty, 280-286. [ Hyperlinks ]
Berscheid, Elizabeth., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Destination and you can intimate matchmaking. For the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), This new handbook away from personal therapy (Vol. 2, next ed. Pp. 193-281). Nyc: McGraw-Slope. [ Backlinks ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2004, Can get 11). You.S. Patent six,735,568. Arizona, DC. [ Hyperlinks ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. Roentgen. https://internationalwomen.net/sv/australia-kvinnor/, Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2008, Nov. 18). You.S. Patent 7,454,357B2. Washington, DC. [ Website links ]
Buss, D. Yards. (1984). Relationship variety to own character dispositions: Review with about three different study supplies. Choices Family genes, 14, 111-123. [ Links ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, R. (1965). Magnitude off positive and negative reinforcements because the a determinant out of interest. Log from Identity and Personal Mindset, dos, 884-889. [ Hyperlinks ]
Carter, S. Roentgen. (2005, Feb.), For progressive-time Cupids, studies replaces matchmaking: Psychological research is actually trailing the fresh new winning matches generated at the eHarmony. Organization to possess Emotional Technology Observer, 18. Installed of [ Hyperlinks ]
Carter, S. Roentgen., & Buckwalter, J. Grams. (2009). Boosting partner choices through the internet: An assessment out of dating quality anywhere between marriages as a result of an online dating program and marriages arising from unfettered solutions. Interpersona: A major international Journal with the Private Relationship, step three, 105-125. [ Links ]
Carter, S., & Snowfall, C. (2004, May). Permitting men and women enter into top marriage ceremonies using predictive types of relationship achievement. Papers demonstrated in the 16th Yearly Meeting of one’s Western Psychological Area. [ Hyperlinks ]
Means and you will program for pinpointing individuals who are planning enjoys a fruitful relationship
C). How come identification amount into the ination away from feature anxiety, negativity, and you may marital satisfaction. Diary off Character and you will Personal Therapy, 78, 326-336. [ Links ]
Clark, Yards. S. (1985). Effects off relationships type of to have facts compatibility. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you may in conflict matchmaking (pp. 119-140). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex differences in relationship ambition and you can pleasure having computer system-developed lovers. Journal out-of ily, twenty eight, 62-66. [ Backlinks ]
Cooper, A good., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Relationship on the net: Information on the internet destination. Journal out-of Sex Training and you can Therapy, 22, 7-fourteen. [ Links ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Do some body understand what they require: The same otherwise complementary mate? Evolutionary Therapy, six, 595-602. [ Website links ]
Feingold, An excellent. (1988). Complimentary for elegance within the intimate couples and you may same-sex family: An excellent meta-studies and theoretical criticism. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Hyperlinks ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Out of attractive to terrible: Disenchantment that have a romantic mate. Sociological Viewpoints, forty-two, 263-280. [ Links ]