Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stage peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Weight reduction discipline was measured of the Slimming down Level of Eating Thinking Take to (EAT) (Garner, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), composed of sixteen statements obtained on the a 6-point level (never ever = 0/always = 5), having highest score showing an advanced from restrained dining. With the Consume psychometrical attributes select Gather mais aussi al. (1982). New consistency coefficient both for examples, the new North american country and German of them, is actually of the same really worth, a leader away from 0.76.
Diet discipline
Ineffectiveness measure. The new bad apply at basis are estimated through the Ineffectiveness Size off brand new Food Problems List (EDI) (Gather ainsi que al., 1983), which has shown a great convergent authenticity (ineffectiveness/self confidence ) from R = 0.70 (p
Medical group took the weight and you may level procedures
Body mass index (BMI). Body mass index is determined because the weight https://kissbrides.com/es/novias-italianas/ in kilograms split by the peak in the square meters (Body mass index = kg/m2).
Before studies collection, a great airplane pilot study of the brand new Silhouettes Level (Profile 1), placed on a sample including 20 Mexican youngsters, was utilized to evaluate the new appropriateness of the numbers so you’re able to portray muscles versions, to validate a great acceptation from an unfamiliar gang of silhouettes and you will a clear comprehension of new tips (the latest Italian language group currently measured that have data in this regard). The outcome showed this new Outline Level try good or an enthusiastic compatible means to your North american country decide to try.
Brand new investigators of the two nations, in the Mexico Area at Hae (standardized) techniques. The newest questionnaires was indeed put on sets of medical and you can nursing students at the North american country and you may German universities. One of the reasons about the fresh ples out of students regarding treatments was only the interest one (you can suppose) this type of young people have to have with the scientific field as well as for health issues, which makes them a great deal more attentive to dilemmas such as for instance ED. Advised agree is obtained from the study professionals. All contacted pupils wanted to engage. This new respective local stability committees accepted new low-intrusive processes. Elite group translators undertook and managed the fresh new translation and retranslation of the tools.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for